Commit d323ef20 authored by Karen Tracey's avatar Karen Tracey
Browse files

[1.0.X] Fixed #9411 -- Changed the test from r9081 to be more robust across...

[1.0.X] Fixed #9411 -- Changed the test from r9081 to be more robust across different database backends. 

Backport of [9254] from trunk (I neglected to mention in the ticket this affected 1.0.X branch).

Also updated svnmerge metadata; all eligible fixes have been backported and all others blocked.


git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/branches/releases/1.0.X@9275 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
parent 71ae6cbf
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+6 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -974,11 +974,12 @@ about them and shouldn't do bad things.
>>> expected == result
True

Make sure bump_prefix() (an internal Query method) doesn't (re-)break.
>>> query = Tag.objects.values_list('id').order_by().query
>>> query.bump_prefix()
>>> print query.as_sql()[0]
SELECT U0."id" FROM "queries_tag" U0
Make sure bump_prefix() (an internal Query method) doesn't (re-)break. It's
sufficient that this query runs without error.
>>> qs = Tag.objects.values_list('id', flat=True).order_by('id')
>>> qs.query.bump_prefix()
>>> list(qs)
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Calling order_by() with no parameters removes any existing ordering on the
model. But it should still be possible to add new ordering after that.