Commit 356dfd53 authored by Malcolm Tredinnick's avatar Malcolm Tredinnick
Browse files

Fixed #7098 -- Old-style related-model order_by() syntax was being incorrectly

marked as erroneous. It's just more dangerous and risky, not forbidden. This
commit restores backwards compatibility there.


git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7490 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
parent 6d986360
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ NULLABLE = 6
MULTI = 'multi'
SINGLE = 'single'

ORDER_PATTERN = re.compile(r'\?|[-+]?\w+$')
ORDER_PATTERN = re.compile(r'\?|[-+]?[.\w]+$')
ORDER_DIR = {
    'ASC': ('ASC', 'DESC'),
    'DESC': ('DESC', 'ASC')}
+4 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -654,5 +654,9 @@ Bug #7045 -- extra tables used to crash SQL construction on the second use.
>>> s = qs.query.as_sql()
>>> s = qs.query.as_sql()   # test passes if this doesn't raise an exception.

Bug #7098 -- Make sure semi-deprecated ordering by related models syntax still
works.
>>> Item.objects.values('note__note').order_by('queries_note.note', 'id')
[{'note__note': u'n2'}, {'note__note': u'n3'}, {'note__note': u'n3'}, {'note__note': u'n3'}]
"""}