Commit 0fab0a4a authored by Peter Korsgaard's avatar Peter Korsgaard
Browse files

fs/ext2: bump journal overhead to 1300 blocks



A quick test with a ~3.5MB ext4 filesystem shows that 1081 blocks isn't
enough:

tune2fs 1.42.7 (21-Jan-2013)

Please run e2fsck on the filesystem.

Creating journal inode:
Journal size too big for filesystem.

So bump it a bit. Overestimating the journal size is probably not really
a big deal for the kind of systems using ext3/4 anyway.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
parent a2a266e0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+3 −6
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -34,14 +34,11 @@ then
    # we scale inodes / blocks with 10% to compensate for bitmaps size + slack
    BLOCKS=$(du -s -c -k $TARGET_DIR | grep total | sed -e "s/total//")
    BLOCKS=$(expr 500 + \( $BLOCKS + $INODES / 8 \) \* 11 / 10)
    # we add 1081 blocks (a bit more than 1 MiB, assuming 1KiB blocks) for
    # we add 1300 blocks (a bit more than 1 MiB, assuming 1KiB blocks) for
    # the journal if ext3/4
    # Note: I came to 1081 blocks after trial-and-error checks. With 1080 or
    # less additional blocks, and tune2fs would refuse to add the journal;
    # with 1081 additional blocks or above, tune2fs wil happily add a journal.
    # YMMV.
    # Note: I came to 1300 blocks after trial-and-error checks. YMMV.
    if [ ${GEN} -ge 3 ]; then
        BLOCKS=$(expr 1081 + $BLOCKS )
        BLOCKS=$(expr 1300 + $BLOCKS )
    fi
    set -- $@ -b $BLOCKS
fi